Everyone's entitled to Jeanne's opinion

World AIDS Day

2012-11-30T10:42:00.001-05:00

I’m flooded with memories today.

I was running Allegheny Women’s Center when the first reports came in. I remember sitting at my desk in1981, reading the CDC’s “Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,” as I did each week. And there, in the middle of stories about measles, STDs, rabies, pregnancy, and car wrecks, was a small item about a cluster of cases in San Francisco. Young, healthy men were being diagnosed with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and Kaposi’s sarcoma, diseases usually associated with older men with impaired immune systems. All the patients were identified as “homosexual’ in the article.

“This can’t be good,” I thought.

That was the understatement of a life time. All hell broke loose. It didn’t take long for epidemiologists to determine that the epicenter of this new pandemic was the gay male community (at the time, along with Haitians and others), and then the media dubbed it the “Gay Plague.” Once that happened, the rightwing seized on it as a “gift from God,” and rightful punishment for sodomy. And gallows humor abounded, with one of the jokes in the community being, “What’s the hardest thing about having AIDS? Trying to convince your parents you’re Haitian.”

But there was nothing funny about what happened. My friends started getting sick, fast – and dying, in pain and isolation. I had to stop congratulating people on weight loss, because there was always the possibility that they had AIDS. Health care providers shunned people with AIDS, refusing to them care. My friend Mary Grace Fitzgerald, a nurse, told of caring for a man dying of AIDS who started crying as she was helping him. He told her she was the first person to touch him without massive gloves, gowns, etc., since he had been diagnosed. Many funeral homes refused to bury AIDS patients, too. And no one knew exactly how anyone got AIDS (the name alone said that – AIDS stands for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, not a disease but a collection of symptoms – and no one knew how to treat it, let alone prevent it or cure it. It was an awful awful awful time.

So a despised, powerless, and often hidden community came under attack by disease and bigotry. So what did they and their allies do? In the words of the Church Ladies for Choice, “Dress up, Fight Back!” Courageous leaders like Charles Rinaldo, Monte Ho, David Lyter, and Tony Silvestre got the Pitt Men’s Study up and running, with the help of Lucky Johns, Randy Forrester, Sharon Sutton, and many others. The Pitt Men’s Study was the first safe medical haven anywhere for people who had or thought they had AIDS. Still active today, the study led the research that eventually moved AIDS from a certain death sentence to a manageable chronic disease for people with access to medical care.

But we all took action politically, too. My friend Billy Hileman formed the direct action Cry Out!, and I was thrilled to be a charter member. With Randy Forrester, co-founder and head of Persad, as the most well-known political leader in the community, we pushed for both AIDs issues and civil rights on a local, state, and national level. And even though lesbians were among those least likely to contract AIDS, the lesbian community jumped in to help their brothers – joining the political fight and providing the community care and support so desperately needed.

It was hard. Bigotry and fear were rampant. We had to fight through two different Pittsburgh City Council classes to get sexual orientation added to the protected classes under the Pittsburgh Human Relations Commission. One of the leaders of that fight was my dear friend and civil rights icon Alma Speed Fox. The Reagan administration was particularly awful, refusing to even recognize the AIDS pandemic until 2005. I was at a huge demonstration in front of the White House, where we engaged in civil disobedience. When the police started to move in, they donned massive and extra thick gloves (think hazardous waste), which enraged the crowd. People muttered about fighting the police. Then suddenly a chant began, picked up by the crowd: “Your gloves don’t match your shoes. You’ll see it on the news.” Everybody vamped and laughed. Then, when the arrests occurred, the police brought in two buses – one for men and one for women. My friend, Lois Galgay Reckitt, who was handcuffed, leaned out the window and quipped, “They really don’t get it!”

In 1987, when I was press secretary for NOW, the organizers of the Second National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights asked the NOW staff to provide major assistance to"The Great March." The slogan of the march was, "For love and for life, we're not going back!" We had all intended to help – after all, then NOW President Ellie Smealwas one of the leaders. But we found that so many of the people working on the march were unable to continue because they had AIDS and had damaged their precarious health through their non-stop work, that we had to jump in with both feet.

By the next march in 1993, the medical research and treatment had begun to change the dynamic, so an HIV positive diagnosis was not an automatic and ugly death sentence – at least, for those who had health insurance. Billy Hileman was one of the four national co-chairs of the march, who gave me the amazing gift of hiring me to coordinate news media coverage for the march and our issues. We re-framed the debate with that march, no longer having to defend our lives against AIDS/HIV, but adding LGBTQ rights to the civil rights agenda of the nation. And our civil rights movement continues today with marriage equality among other issues.

But while AIDS is no longer a death sentence in the U.S., that cannot be said about all of our global neighbors. Poverty is now linked to HIV, particularly in Africa. Life-saving anti-viral drugs are started too late or not available. And bigotry and ignorance still prevail.

My close friends are no longer dying in huge numbers, but too many others are. So I’ll be wearing a different red ribbon pin this World AIDS Day. Mine is from the American Federation of Teachers, and it combines the red with the colors of Africa.

This Thanksgiving, thank a politician. Seriously.

2012-11-22T11:42:00.001-05:00

This year, I’m thankful for one particular, much-maligned group.

Politicians.

Not a usual choice, I know. And after this historically expensive, long and divisive election cycle – marked by bold faced lies, attacks, and counter attacks, all delivered directly to our homes via non-stop television ads – many ordinary citizens vilified politicians, declaring, "a pox on all their houses," as did many journalists. In fact, it’s become fashionable for self-styled opinion leaders to condemn all politicians as crooks and liars.

But politicians are actually heroes.

From the birth of our nation, brave women and men, engaged as politicians, have led the fight to make our nation a more perfect union, allowing the voices of ordinary citizens to be heard. Thanks to politicians – both professional (elected) and volunteer (non-elected) – we are able to stand up to the status quo and the monied interests. We ended slavery; expanded the right to vote; created free public education; ended more than one unjust war; made abortion and birth control legal; passed Social Security and Medicare; created a social safety net; adopted laws that protect workers lives, health, wages, and their right to collective bargaining; passed laws to protect the environment; and ended laws that were targeted against LGBTQ sexual activities (activities that most of the nation regardless of sexual orientation happily engages in).

We certainly aren’t finished making our union more perfect, but we’re on our way.

As this year’s election proved, none of the rights we fought for are absolutely secure, and we must be ever vigilant and more engaged in politics than ever. The monied interests, however, would love nothing better than to have citizens decry politics and politicians, and tune out, turn off, and drop out.

While others stay on the sidelines criticizing but not engaging, politicians are making our democracy work. They risk their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to try to make a difference. These public servants often work every day, every night, week day and weekend, throughout our communities and our nation, meeting with citizens and offering solutions.

So this Thanksgiving, please join me in giving thanks for politicians. Without them, we simply would have no democracy.

I'm wearing purple today, and so should you

2012-10-19T01:53:00.000-04:00

Today is Spirit Day, a day for everyone to take a stand against bullying and to support LGBTQ youth, who are so often the victims of bullying. And you can show your support by wearing purple.

I've always thought one of the worst aspects of any kind of discrimination is that the victims are the ones responsible for confronting and eradicating it.

Seriously, think about. When you are discriminated against, you have less power. And that means you start from behind.So you are always fighting an uphill battle.

But when others join your fight -- when people who are not the victims of discrimination take on YOUR fight -- it gets easier. And eventually, it gets better. Because it snowballs.

More voices join in pointing out how wrong discrimination is. More voices object to demeaning jokes and images. More voices speak up for what is right. And the voices of intolerance and bullying either get converted, or get quieter.

I know it can be scary. Confronting anyone is hard, and it is especially hard when it comes from people in authority. It might be a teacher. The captain of the football team. Your family. Or even an elected official or a candidate.

The first time that I, as a public figure, was attacked as a lesbian, I had already been confronting discrimination for years. I was running for public office at the time. LGBT rights was a key part of my platform. I had a track record of fighting against bigotry. I was one of the founders of Cry Out! which eventually became Cry Out/Act Up! I had coordinated media outreach for the March on Washington for LGBT rights. And I was working as part of a core strategy group to add sexual orientation to the Pittsburgh Human Relations law.

Of course, I had been "Dyke-baited" before, but it was mostly by anti-abortion, anti-ERA picketers who believed devoutly in harassment. But when it came during a campaign, from one of my opponents in a part of the community that had a reputation for being hostile to the LGBT community, I was unprepared.

How could I stand up for my core beliefs, yet also not pretend to be something I was not? How could I keep faith with the LGBT community at the same time keeping faith with my heterosexual marriage and the husband I dearly loved? I couldn't disavow my lesbian sisters, nor could I disavow my husband. And I had to answer the attack without doing either.

As I got up to respond, it hit me. This was bullying, pure and simple. And it was an attempt to force me off my message, onto the defense, and perhaps out of politics. And I finally knew deep in my soul what every young lesbian, gay man, bisexual, and transgender student felt everyday of their lives.

So I stood up. I took a deep breath. And I spoke out.

"I doesn't matter what my sexual orientation is. But my opponent's question reveals a lot more about him that it does about me," I said. "Because he's a bully. And he's a bigot. He is trying to distract you, and make you afraid. Because he thinks appealing to fear and bigotry is a way to win elections.

"He may be right, but I sure hope not. And I think that you, the voters, are smarter than that.

"Don't vote for me because you think I'm straight. Or because you think I'm a lesbian. I want your votes, but more than that, I want us to leave bullying and name calling behind, and support and love all of our family and friends, gay or straight."

The room was quiet when I finished, and no one clapped. But it didn't matter. I was at peace with myself. And that night I had a very small taste of the horrid behavior too many LGBT youths have to endure. And I knew how very important it was for allies to speak out forcefully.

So join me in wearing purple for Spirit Day. If you've never spoken out before, it's a great first step. And it's the least you can do to put an end to bullying and bigotry.

Since when are bigotry and intolerance American values?

2012-09-13T16:37:00.003-04:00

It is nothing short of horrific that the Romney/Ryan response to the murders of American diplomats in Libya was to attack President Obama, claiming he had "apologized for American values."

But what are these American values that Mitt Romney is defending? Based on the YouTube video that was the ostensible match to the international tinderbox, the values he defends are absolute religious intolerance and hate-filled and deliberate provocation to violence. Not exactly the freedom of speech our founders envisioned. No, it's the 21st century equivalent of shouting fire in a crowded theatre.

As the story unfolds, it seems clear that the Republican ticket has been captured by the voices of hatred and intolerance, and they will do absolutely anything to gain a political advantage – even endanger the security of the American people, the American military, and our diplomats.

No matter what the politics, Americans do not turn on one another when our nation’s security is at stake. Democrats rallied to Republican President George W. Bush’s side when we were attacked on 911. Unfortunately, Romney/Ryan seem not to understand the need to stand together.

This spectacle is reminiscent of what the nation witnessed in the U.S. Senate in 1954, when Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy attacked the U.S. Army and those who supported our military.

Here is the relevant history, from the website of the U.S. Senate:

“In the spring of 1954, McCarthy picked a fight with the U.S. Army, charging lax security at a top-secret army facility. The army responded that the senator had sought preferential treatment for a recently drafted subcommittee aide. Amidst this controversy, McCarthy temporarily stepped down as chairman (sic) for the duration of the three-month nationally televised spectacle known to history as the Army-McCarthy hearings.

“The army hired Boston lawyer Joseph Welch to make its case. At a session on June 9, 1954, McCarthy charged that one of Welch's attorneys had ties to a Communist organization. As an amazed television audience looked on, Welch responded with the immortal lines that ultimately ended McCarthy's career: "Until this moment, Senator, I think I never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness." When McCarthy tried to continue his attack, Welch angrily interrupted, "Let us not assassinate this lad further, senator. You have done enough. Have you no sense of decency?"

“Overnight, McCarthy's immense national popularity evaporated. Censured by his Senate colleagues, ostracized by his party, and ignored by the press, McCarthy died three years later, 48 years old and a broken man.”

The Romney/Ryan ticket should pay close attention to McCarthy’s fall. Because those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

An open letter to Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl

2012-08-27T17:48:00.002-04:00

Dear Mayor Ravenstahl,

Your public attack on me in the reception line at the Cookie Cruise – berating me for criticizing your promotion of George Trosky to assistant police chief, screaming that I was a "hypocrite," and threatening to "go public" with what you perceive to be my failure to support all domestic violence survivors – was bizarre, to say the least. Coming on the heels of the same threat made to me on your behalf by City Councilmember Theresa Kail-Smith the day before, it was clear you intended to silence me.

That's not going to happen. Three women are murdered by spouses or ex-spouses in this country every day, and it must be stopped. I believe that promoting Trosky will make the problem worse here. Not just for women, but also for other police officers, and for the city as a whole. But you insist on taking actions like this promotion – actions that harm our city – just because they serve your personal needs and desires.

When my phone started ringing with reporters seeking comment about the Trosky promotion at 5:05 Monday afternoon (after your office apparently released the news at 5:01, a classic and blatant move to avoid press coverage), I was shocked by the news. After all, we've been through this before. Trosky's record – multiple incidents of battering, violent on-camera attacks on concertgoers, his failure to make lieutenant, and his spotty record that included serious disciplinary actions – was one of the flashpoints for the women's rights community when you promoted him directly from sergeant to commander in 2007.

Working with City Council, women's advocates demanded and held public hearings, brought in experts, and Council wrote and passed new policy for dealing with domestic violence by police officers.

You then agreed to further negotiations. You said you wanted a policy of zero tolerance and would be a champion against violence against women and children. The negotiations resulted in more agreements, including education and assistance programs on domestic violence for all city employees. You also agreed that you would consult with domestic violence professionals prior to promotions, especially if any police officer up for promotion had a family violence issue.

Until Monday, it appeared you were keeping your agreement, dealing with domestic violence by city employees as the serious and deadly crime it is.

I really was shocked by the news that you were promoting Trosky again, this time to assistant chief – even though his record as commander included failing to protect at least one woman from her abuser, letting him loose after arrest to return to attack her again.

So I spoke out against the promotion. Your excuse is that Trosky hasn't beaten up a woman he claims to love in a long time – that it's in the past. Last I checked, being a batterer isn't something you out grow, like acne or allergies. Your administration also pointed out that Trosky's victims withdrew the charges – something that happens often according to studies, given the ability of police officers to use their professional knowledge and connections to rig the system against the victims.

Assaulting anyone is a serious crime, and Trosky has done this repeatedly. We wouldn't promote someone who had a history of other crimes, like arson or burglary. We don't allow child molesters to teach, even if their crimes were in the past. Trosky's history should have automatically kept him from this promotion.

There are a number of great officers – women and men – who have played by the rules, worked their ways up through the ranks, and would make a great assistant chief. But they don't necessarily fit the one condition you obviously require. In our conversation, Councilwoman Kail-Smith told me, "If you were mayor, you'd want someone who had your back." I'm astonished that you actually believe you need your own personal command staff officer – paid for by taxpayers – to protect you. Not, apparently, as security in carrying out your mayoral duties, but for some other amorphous protection need.

The message to the rank and file police officers is clear: it's who you know, and a willingness to do all you can to protect those in power, not your skills, your record, your abilities, or your commitment to protect all Pittsburghers. Perhaps this is the reason that Director Huss was opposed to this promotion, especially at this time.

Trosky's promotion also sends a message about your lack of concern about officer safety. Having an assistant chief who is at best indifferent to arresting batterers has to worry officers as they deal with these situations. We know domestic violence are among the most dangerous calls to go on; now our police have an additional concern that command staff won't provide the support they need.

But enough with the refresher on domestic violence 101. Because this is actually about politics, and your need to destroy anyone you believe is your enemy. Because I have insisted that batterers should not be police officers (as federal law requires) – and certainly should not be promoted – you think this is personal, and that I am your enemy. You should know better. I am acting on principle, as part of my life-long activism for women.

Your attempt to bully me and your threat to destroy me is ludicrous. If you thought I would be frightened, you are sadly mistaken. And if you thought destroying me would mean no one else would take up the fight for women's safety, and transparent and fair promotions in the police force, you are even more mistaken.

While you were screaming at me at the Cookie Cruise, I finally realized what was behind that threat. You yelled at me, "Where were you when I fired other batterers, like firefighters?"

Then I realized what the problem was. You are livid because I did not praise you publicly when you kept your promise and followed the policy you agreed to.

You should know that I have never subscribed to the "everybody gets a trophy" school – not as a parent, not as an activist, nor in my work life. So your expectation that you must be praised when you do keep your promises, and you do your job as required, is baffling. Yes, you did the right thing with other batterers. But that's what you were elected to do. It's what you are supposed to do. It's what adults do.

Your allegation that I condemned the Trosky promotion for personal political gain is off the mark, and totally ignores my history as an activist. But it is an interesting claim, since in that calculus, you admit that the majority of Pittsburghers agree with the women's rights advocates, not you, on this matter.

But there's another, unspoken threat. People who disagree with you find themselves harassed and targeted by city employees. The building inspector suddenly files a complaint for weeds on your opponent's property. His/her car keeps getting parking tickets or the vehicle is towed. She/he is followed and investigated. City services suddenly disappear. Her/his employment is threatened.

But I will not give you a free pass to harass me or other women's rights advocates. In case you forgot, I ran a women's health center for nine years. My house was firebombed. My son was shot at. I traveled in a bullet proof vest. And I learned that bullies thrive on secrecy.

So know that I will go public if anything happens to any women's services, to other advocates, or to the people I love. You can guarantee it.

In terms of our records and behavior, both public and private, I am more than willing to have the public judge both of us. I'm not sure you can say the same thing.

I didn't ask for this fight. I only asked that you do your job and keep your promises. Do that, and you won't hear any criticism from me.
Jeanne Clark

The union rides to the rescue -- again

2012-08-19T19:24:00.001-04:00

The yes vote on the new four-year contract by the members of Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Workers – the drivers, mechanics, and supervisors of the Port Authority – is another heroic example of our public servants voting for the best interest of the people they serve, even when it means a personal loss.

And these workers took quite a personal hit. They gave back another $60 million dollars in wages and benefits, on top of the concessions from the last four-year contract, adding up to more than $100 million in concessions in the last five years. To save public transit, the workers have agreed to work for and with less.

Their courageous vote will save our region's economy, environment, quality of life, and our future.

Without this vote, massive public transit service cuts and fare increases would devastate our community. With little public transit and a huge influx of cars on the roads, businesses would lose. Their customers would not be able to reach them, and neither would their employees. Travel times for ambulances and fire trucks would vastly increase, meaning the difference between living and dying for some. Just as we are starting to grow our population after decades of loss, our region would be far less attractive to students, workers, and new employers. And the addition of more vehicles on our streets would make our air quality dangerous on far too many days.

These workers cannot – and should not– do it alone. County Executive Rich Fitzgerald led the negotiations, and has pledged to do his part. Gov. Corbett has apparently promised – behind closed doors, as he does most things – to pay the state's fair share temporarily.

But we need to solve the funding issue permanently, and stop demanding more and more concessions from our public workers.

Our state leaders need to stop demonizing both the people who rely on public transportation, and the hard-working people who run it, and pay their fair share.

It's fashionable in many quarters – including some progressive areas – to say that our public workers are out of control, that they demand too much.

People forget that they are our teachers, our police, our firefighters, our bus drivers – and they are all our neighbors. They make our society run.

And we made a pact with them. We agreed to pay them a decent wage, health benefits, limited job security, and to allow them to pay into a pension plan that will allow them to live with dignity after their years of service. They agreed to work hard, and to serve under many restrictions, which varied by group. In most cases, they have limited promotion opportunities, and really good wages come only after decades of service. Many have restricted rights on their political activities. And all agreed to serve the public to their best.

But then came the destruction of our economy. The collapse of the financial industry – caused by the collusion of voracious and gluttonous megabanks that were "too big to fail," and elected officials and regulators who dismantled all protections for the people – meant the pension funds were no longer as healthy. The massive tax cuts to the wealthy during two wars plus a near-depression meant trickle down tax increases in every local community.

Led by the braying rightwing and echoed by the news media, "greedy workers" became the problem. And when no one in Harrisburg would act like an adult, take responsibility, and work to save our vital public transportation system, it was up to the union and its workers to ride to the rescue.

So next time you ride a bus or the T, or even pass one, give those terrific heroes a wave and say thank you. They didn't cause the problem. But they are solving it.

The fare you put in the box is nothing compared to the cost these public servants paid to keep our transportation going. We all owe them a big one.

Correction and Update on Attorney General’s race

2012-04-22T23:32:00.000-04:00

I was contacted today by Patrick Murphy’s political and communications director with online information that the Westboro Baptist Church had picketed Catherine Baker Knoll’s funeral.

I apologize to Patrick. I tried to confirm his account before I wrote my blog, but had not succeeded.

I’m delighted to make the correction – I was, as I said, shocked at what Patrick had said. I am pleased that he didn’t misspeak about the picketing.

However, Patrick was wrong in his remarks at the Allegheny County Democratic Dinner when he said Catherine was pro-choice. She was not, and I know she would want that record corrected. She was a strong woman who had to take on the male establishment every time she ran, and she did it on her own terms. It is only right that we remember her as she was.

I still firmly believe that Kathleen Kane is a far better choice for Attorney General and deserves better treatment than she has received by the men of the party. Similarly, the attacks on Rep. Babette Josephs and Cong. Allyson Young Schwartz are beyond the pale.

There is not one woman on the endorsed slate in Allegheny County, and if Kathleen does not win the Primary, we will have an entirely male slate statewide. Yet our hopes of winning in November depend largely on women’s votes. We cannot always hope that the Republicans declare war on women to drive women voters into the Democratic column. We actually have to provide a home for women, and that means on all levels, in leadership, and on the ballot.

Once again, I apologize to Patrick. However, Kathleen Kane will make a far better Attorney General.

Why Kathleen Kane is the only choice for PA Attorney General

2012-04-21T23:05:00.000-04:00

I am very concerned that -- in a year when we have an opportunity to bring women into the Democratic Party in huge numbers -- we might, once again, have an all male statewide ticket. That's one of many reasons I'm supporting Kathleen Kane. I am also concerned that two of our strongest incumbent women, leaders on all Democratic issues and outstanding supporters of women's rights -- Allyson Young Schwartz (PA's only female member of Congress) and State Representative Babette Josephs -- are under attack by male candidates. This is highly unlikely to happen to male incumbents with their stature, and level of activity in defense of all of us.

But it's more than my preference for women candidates, and the need to attract women voters, vitally important as that is. I've met with both Kathleen and Patrick Murphy, and I believe Kathleen has superior experience, and is much more likely to win the general -- a race we have never won, and for which we have consistently nominated white men from the eastern part of the state. That pattern clearly is not working. And despite what you might have heard, Kathleen and Patrick have identical positions on the social issues I care about. She is also able to self-finance, which is a huge plus in the general.

It is also apparent to me that part of the background of this race is Obama vs. Hillary redux. Kathleen was a strong Hillary supporter and Patrick for Obama. And it was clear by the way that every male elected official lined up behind Patrick, that the national party had given marching orders to support Patrick. But even with all that arrayed against her, Patrick was still unable to win the state party endorsement. And although Hillary is legally prevented from being involved in politics, Bill Clinton has been stumping hard for her.

I actually went into this very open to supporting Patrick Murphy, because I respected his courage as a member of Congress, especially challenging don't ask don't tell, and had met and spoken with him several times. (Kathleen has also reached out to me early.) But his conduct and that of his campaign have left a very sour taste - they have been much more involved in character assassination than in discussing Patrick's credentials for this office. In addition, his total lack of knowledge about what the Attorney General can and cannot do, and his insistence on making promises that cannot be kept -- running more for Congress than AG -- have shocked me. (See, for instance, the video of both candidates at the debate sponsored earlier this year by the ShadysideDems, the 14th Ward Democractic Committee, and the 14th Ward Independent Democratic Club.)

But Thursday night, Patrick's presentation at the Allegheny County Democratic Committee dinner -- which was in tribute to women -- was beyond the pale. First off, none of the three things he promised he would do as AG were actually things that an AG can do. Then, his discussion of Catherine Baker Knoll's funeral -- as a way to show how courageous and pro-woman he is -- was shameful.

He stated Catherine was pro-choice. That wasn't true.He said there were picketers at her funeral because she was pro-choice. That wasn't true. And he said he confronted the picketers. I don't know how that can be true.
I've checked with many people who were at Catherine's funeral. Not one remembers any picketers. And it was fully public knowledge that Catherine was strongly anti-abortion -- always was.

I don't know why Patrick would say these things in a room full of people who knew it was untrue. Did he deliberately lie to make himself look good? Or has he deluded himself into not remembering the past properly? Or does he think he is so charming and entitled that no one would call him on his misstatements?

But whatever the reason, it was truly shocking. And it has moved me from simply supporting Kathleen and urging others to support her, to urging anyone I know to please campaign for her, and tell your friends to vote for her.

Anyone who would campaign in the reckless manner that Patrick Murphy has is not someone who should be the Commonwealth's chief law enforcement officer.

Congressional, religious leaders oppose pill

2012-04-01T14:23:00.000-04:00

(April 1, 2012 – Washington) - The Speaker of the House, Majority Leader of the Senate and several other political leaders joined religious leaders today in condemning the ongoing development and marketing of Viagra, a medication for impotent men.

“This is an absolute outrage,” said House Speaker Jane Boehner at a hastily-called press conference on Capitol Hill. “This so-called medical advance goes against the very fabric of family values. I intend to convene a special committee to investigate how this came about -- and if any federal funds were involved, you can be sure that prosecution will follow!”

“Erections have caused problems since God made the world,” said Senate Minority Leader Midge McConnell. “Impotence is God’s way of protecting us, and we have no right to interfere. If God had wanted men’s erections to be necessary, she would not have provided us with non-vaginal orgasms.”

Representative Christine Smith, self-appointed leader of the pro-limp caucus, vowed to seek legislation to stop the use of the drug. “Even though the extremists of the FDA insist on licensing this drug, there are still things we can do,” Smith explained. “Our first item will be to insist on spousal consent. No man has the right to erections without the written consent of his wife -- after all, she’s the one who will have to deal with it."

Senator Rhonda Blunt also vowed to pass legislation against Viagra. “Those desperate men who think they need this poison must be protected,” she vowed. “If they won’t take advantage of all the loving and gentle pro-limp counseling centers, we must insist that they are fully informed of their risks. I will be introducing legislation mandating informed consent, and a 24-hour waiting period before the prescription is filled. We will also require prostatic sonograms and rectal probes. We must make sure that these men know all the risks: unfulfilled fantasies, ejaculatory failure, deflated ego and loss of their manhood -- before they take this poison. And they have a right to meet the pill pusher at least 24 hours before having this noxious potion thrust upon them.”

“Erections are NOT health care,” thundered former Senator Regina Santorum, who is actively courting pro-limpers as part of her year 2012 presidential campaign. “As God is my witness, not one dollar of federal money -- not one dollar of Medicaid and Medicare money – not one dollar of insurance money, will go to pay for this poison when I’m president. Innocent taxpayers must not be forced to pay for this toxin.”

The members of Congress were joined by Bonnie Kuhar, President of Pharmacists for Limp. She began by holding up a quote from Pope Beatrice: “Erections are the ultimate evil in society. They are a cancer that invades our families, and cause untold havoc. All women of good will have an obligation to stop erections -- to save the family of women.” She also announced that her organization had received $1.5 Million from the National Conference of Catholic Bishops to persuade all pharmacists “not to participate in this medical travesty.”

Other pro-limpers around the nation vowed even stronger action. Randi Terry vowed to shut down any drug store providing Viagra. “We will close them down,” she vowed. “We will picket, blockade and invade. We will hound the pill pushers at their work, their homes, their country clubs, and their churches. We will do whatever is necessary to stop this virus of erections from spreading!”

Responding to the attacks on Viagra, Senator Bernard Boxer vowed to protect every man’s right to erections. “The Supreme Court has spoken. Erections are a basic human right. No matter what the women in power – the majority of our elected officials – try to do, men will have erections. We cannot outlaw erections, but we can make them medically safe and supervised. We will NOT return to the bad old days when impotent men were condemned to dealing with their problems alone: over a magazine, in the dark and afraid.”

Newt Gingrich - The 'Kiss My Ass, Women Voters' Candidate

2012-01-21T14:33:00.000-05:00

It should come as no surprise to anyone that Newt Gingrich has a gender chasm going against him with women.

How could he not? His disdain for women oozes from his very being. He uses women for his own purposes and then throws them aside. Two ex-wives got the heave-ho while ill, in each case traded-in for a younger model. And Gingrich's political beliefs about women are equally disgusting, from criminalization of abortion to attacks on women-headed households to opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment, Family and Medical Leave, and other pro-women, pro-family policies. Add in his Olympic level-hypocrisy, and the average woman voter -- even in conservative South Carolina -- cringes.

Republicans generally start off with a negative gender gap among women, but Gingrich's is truly historic. Romney, on the other hand, has a much smaller gap -- one that could be managed in a general election.

The results of tonight's South Carolina Primary should be interesting. If women turn out in droves, it will be to vote against Gingrich, not necessarily to vote for anyone. But they will vote for Romney by default. (Ron Paul and Rick Santorum have far larger gender gaps than Romney.) But if women say to hell with it and don't show up, Gingrich will ride in on men's votes. [Insert obligatory penis/male joke here.]

But I have to say that I'm conflicted about what will happen. As a woman, I don't want Gingrich to win. But as a Democrat, I don't really want Romney to win.

After all, with Newt's track record, if he were the Republican nominee, you can be sure he won't let a little thing like a Presidential campaign interfere with his search for his next mistress and future Ex Mrs. Gingrich #4. He just won't be able to help himself.

Sometimes all you can do is help one person

2011-12-16T17:39:00.000-05:00

So many terrible things happen to people, and usually you can’t make much of a difference. But here’s one where you can.

This story about Odessa Wilson just about broke my heart. She’s 82, on a very limited income, and just had to decide whether to keep her house insured, or to pay her utilities. She chose the utilities.

On Sunday, a drunk driver drove right into her house, causing over $13,000 in damages. The driver had the state minimum in liability, so Ms. Wilson will get under $5,000 from the driver’s auto insurance.

http://www.wtae.com/news/30006471/detail.html

I talked to Jim Parsons, the reporter who broke the story, and he said that no fund has been set up, and that it is likely that the local social service agencies won’t be able to help much either. But he did give me Ms. Wilson’s address -- 2322 Centre Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15219.

So, if you can, join me in making a difference in one woman’s life. I sent a check today.

On a political note, this is such stark evidence of how the economy works against women, the elderly, the poor. I simply cannot stand that this is how our society treats people who have always played by the rules.

Jeanne

Tom Corbett’s rape, cash, and cover-up problem

2011-11-20T17:10:00.000-05:00

The ongoing scandal of accused child rapist and torturer Jerry Sandusky, who used his connections to Penn State University’s (PSU) football program to lure his victims in, continues to spiral out to ensnare others who failed to protect the boys/victims. And despite Governor Tom Corbett’s attempt to portray himself as a knight in shining armor, the more you connect the dots, the more tarnished his armor gets.

The truth of the matter is that Attorney General Corbett let Sandusky have free rein in the community – possibly prowling for more kids to rape since he was never under surveillance – for nearly three years, and did nothing about it. And this is more than simple benign neglect. Corbett may even have profited while allowing Sandusky to remain out and about.

Unbelievably, although Corbett assigned just one state trooper to investigate Sandusky, Corbett now claims that he moved as fast as he could in bringing Sandusky to justice. A look at the facts and the chronology of the case belies that excuse. It’s a tale of the old boys club protecting one another’s interests, Corbett’s need for campaign cash, and the risk his candidacy faced from enforcing the law against uber popular sports figures. Protecting children from an apparent predator – both the children already raped by Sandusky, and the children at risk as Sandusky was free from even minimal surveillance – apparently fell far down the list.

In 2008, a first year student at a high school in Clinton County came forward, telling his parents and the school administration that Sandusky had been raping him for nearly four years, starting at the Second Mile program.

The Second Mile program was started by Sandusky in 1977, first as a group foster home, later helping children with absent or dysfunctional families. The Second Mile was and is inextricably linked to Sandusky and the Penn State football program. PSU donors and former players raised money for the Second Mile, always praising Sandusky as the leader of the program. PSU itself supported Second Mile in a number of ways, especially with a sweetheart deal on land. And court documents show that Jerry Sandusky systematically used Second Mile, along with the PSU football connection, to lure his young victims in.

After the Clinton County boy came forward (identified in the grand jury presentment as Victim 1), the school district confronted Sandusky, who was a volunteer football coach at the school, and barred him from the school. The district also alerted the Clinton County District Attorney.

The Clinton County D.A. investigated and determined that the rapes had occurred in Centre County, at the Second Mile and PSU. He referred it to the Centre County D.A., who realized pretty quickly that this was a hot potato, and that he had a conflict of interest since he is related by marriage to Sandusky’s adopted son. In March 2009, he referred the case to the Pennsylvania Attorney General, Tom Corbett.

At this point, Sandusky should have been arrested. A victim had come forward. And because there was another report about Sandusky in 1998, there was a transcript of a sting by Centre County DA Ray Gricar, which contained damning evidence of Sandusky apologizing to a parent for what he did to her child. (We may never know why that 1998 case was never prosecuted, since Gricar went missing in 2005 and has now been declared dead.)

In any normal child rape case, the perpetrator would have been arrested. But this was no ordinary case or perpetrator, and Corbett had other issues primarily on his mind.

Corbett was in the throes of his campaign for governor of Pennsylvania at the time, and was also engaged in a series of high profile prosecutions of members of the General Assembly (nearly all Democrats) for use of taxpayer money for campaigning, dubbed “Bonusgate” by the news media. These prosecutions were a lynchpin of his campaign, with virtually no down side and popular with the news media

So when Corbett received the case of the high level former Penn State coach accused of raping and torturing children, he slow walked the prosecution, with, as mentioned earlier, only one investigator on the case. This is a far cry from the 14 investigators Corbett assigned to Bonusgate.

While this single state police investigator worked to uncover the pattern of rape, torture, and cover up – linking Sandusky, PSU, and the Second Mile – Tom Corbett was seeking campaign contributions from many of the same people.

And the old boys club came through. Corbett took in nearly $650,000 for his campaign from past and present board members of the Second Mile and their families and businesses.

It wasn’t until Corbett was sworn in as governor in January 2011 and handed over the reins of the Attorney General’s office, that the investigation of Sandusky and those who abetted him became serious. Seven more investigators were added to the case, and actual prosecution began.

As governor, Corbett continued his close relationship with the Second Mile program, even as the noose was tightening. He approved a $3 million state grant to the program earlier this year, and only rescinded it as questions were raised last week. He now claims that he had to approve the state grant or he would have endangered the Sandusky investigation. That excuse doesn’t even pass the laugh test – there is no requirement that Corbett explain why he approves or disapproves these state grants. Corbett only needed to say no – which is more than the boys Sandusky preyed upon were able to do.

When the story exploded this month, Tom Corbett stood tall, calling for the ouster of anyone who failed to protect these boys and put an end to the nightmare of abuse, rape, and torture.

“When it comes to the safety of children there can be no margin for error, no hesitation to act,” he declared at his press conference.

But for 2-1/2 years, Corbett’s inaction meant that Jerry Sandusky was free to roam around central Pennsylvania and look for more victims, when he should have been in jail.

How much is the boy mayor paying KDKA?

2011-05-07T14:13:00.000-04:00

I was appalled this week to tune in to KDKA TV news to see a hit piece by Andy Sheehan attacking Darlene Harris, County Council President. I sure hope Andy got paid, because this had nothing to do with journalism, but was simply negative advertising by Luke and the boys to try to defeat Darlene in her re-election campaign.

The story was spoon fed to Andy, and the premise was that Darlene was taking money away from crucial pothole filling for her "pet projects" in her district. (The crucial pothole problem alluded to was not in the North Side, which Darlene serves, but in Squirrel Hill, which Doug Shields and Bill Peduto represent. Why there? Squirrel Hill voters complain.)

What the hell is a pet project anyway? Doug had a good comment on my Facebook page today --"Bruce Kraus took in a lost kitten this week. That "pet project'??? What's that have to do with paving?"

Seriously, people only call something a "pet project" when it isn't their project. And last I checked, Darlene wasn't in charge of pothole filling -- it's Public Works. You know, the same guys who could (and have) f*cked up snow removal when we get a light dusting. And it was nice to see that the Director of Public Works had time to attack Darlene on camera. He's such a stud muffin -- just who I want to see representing the "new Pittsburgh" image we're all trying to create.

With Yaronne delivering this story wrapped up in a big red bow to KDKA, the station needs to report this coverage as a campaign contribution, because they sure didn't ask any questions about it. Like why now?

Here's what I think the answer is. Luke's office is pulling out all the stops to remove every independent minded member of council. They have Bruce Kraus, Pat Dowd, and Darlene fully in their crosshairs. In addition, Luke and Yaronne are moving no legislation -- nada -- through Council, playing a waiting game in hopes they can control more votes later. They are particularly not asking Council for any action on anything to do with money. They don't want to open up the books.

So here's a tip for an enterprising reporter out there -- follow the money flowing through the mayor's office. You might be surprised to see where it's gone. And while you're at it, you might want to identify the thugs who are stalking Darlene while she campaigns door to door.

Meanwhile, I'll be looking for the campaign finance disclosure by KDKA. And helping Darlene get re-elected.